Curse

stevedallas · Jan 14, 2009, 01:06 AM // 01:06

/signed

i think this would be a fun title to pursue

Aldric · Jan 14, 2009, 01:13 AM // 01:13

/notsigned

I'm a Ranger primary and have chopped and changed pets a bit and getting a pet to lvl20 takes 30mins or so. This title would result in nothing more than a days work to max and get back to my favoured Polar Bear.

I know some people would run the pets through to lvl20 via the game but for another free and easy title the majority of people would just max it the same as me ,then forget it and never use a pet again.

Chthon · Jan 14, 2009, 02:24 AM // 02:24

I would rather have a Stablemaster NPC. I'd be happy with the title in addition to the Stablemaster though.

Hailey Anne · Jan 14, 2009, 02:46 AM // 02:46

Quote:

Originally Posted by MagmaRed

Not available to people playing classes other than Ranger unless they go x/R just for a pet. And if you mean to tell me a Mo/R using a pet and healing a team is effective, you suck.

We do not need more titles, and this one is biased on class requirement.

/unsigned

While I dont want new titles and /notsigned from me.
Youre reasoning for a no sign is horrible as usual.
First just because a Mo/R tames a pet doesnt mean they will be running around all the time with it.
Second this isnt biased in the least. Beast mastery is not primary attribute therefore can be used effectively by ANY class.
Third who says a monk has to heal anyway? Ever thought maybe they have beated things enough times that they want to mix it up a bit? Probably not since you are so quick to /no sign everything and tell people they suck or how horrible they are.

/still notsigned from me evern though I really disagree with this reasoning.

warrior running · Jan 14, 2009, 03:25 AM // 03:25

/notsigned no reason for this

_Nihilist_ · Jan 14, 2009, 04:29 AM // 04:29

/signed

*on the condition that a Stablemaster or equivalent NPC was added, or better, if you could add your pet in the Party Menu like you can with Heroes (where DO those Heroes go when I'm not using them? Are pets THAT different in regards to having MULTIPLE choices but limited slots for them, or keeping their own separate levels until they gain more XP? NO, THEY AREN'T. Pets even have a mini-bar that acts like a Hero's skillbar (O.o)), provided that you had Charm Animal on your skillbar so that I didn't have to level them just to give them to a Tamer and never see them again so I could get the next Pet and train it to do the same thing.

Leona · Jan 14, 2009, 04:57 AM // 04:57

/notsigned.
Titles are supposed to be about something that you do in the game (for fun already,) to show off either your tremendous waste of time and effort achieving something else (which does include, notably, getting hammered or buzzed in the guild hall so much that it incurs Lordly wrath) or your good, profitable use of time and energy (like the Deep and Warren titles, or something.) Grindtastic titles get kicked in the throat by angry Gurumites as is, and we don't need any more,specially something as silly and neurotic as pet-training, an exercise fully futile for anyone other than a Ranger. (Possible? Yes. of any use? No.) Even for a Ranger, having a pet is of questionable use in most circumstances, especially the non-gimmicky (Lordrush, I'm looking at you.)

pumpkin pie · Jan 14, 2009, 05:01 AM // 05:01

/signed if it comes with a stable

credit · Jan 14, 2009, 05:24 AM // 05:24

uhm lol?

/notsigned for obvious reasons.

Unreal Havoc · Jan 14, 2009, 09:06 AM // 09:06

Quote:

Originally Posted by Leona

/notsigned.
Titles are supposed to be about something that you do in the game (for fun already,) to show off either your tremendous waste of time and effort achieving something else (which does include, notably, getting hammered or buzzed in the guild hall so much that it incurs Lordly wrath) or your good, profitable use of time and energy (like the Deep and Warren titles, or something.) Grindtastic titles get kicked in the throat by angry Gurumites as is, and we don't need any more,specially something as silly and neurotic as pet-training, an exercise fully futile for anyone other than a Ranger. (Possible? Yes. of any use? No.) Even for a Ranger, having a pet is of questionable use in most circumstances, especially the non-gimmicky (Lordrush, I'm looking at you.)

Yet we already get rewarded with nice statues in our Hall of Monuments for levelling pets up, no? Yet that's ok...

I agree that it would be pretty easy to achieve compared to other titles, not that that is nessacarily a bad thing, except maybe to those who like to stroke their E-peen because they think their titles actually mean something to other gamers, but half the reasons I've read against it so far are lolworthy.

Nathaniel (Was 'ere) · Jan 14, 2009, 04:13 PM // 16:13

/Signed.

If they bring a pet barn etc. out in GW 2 then this'd be a good title. As for now, I don't really want to get rid of my pet. I <3 him.

Wubbies · Jan 14, 2009, 04:57 PM // 16:57

/notsigned.... great more silly titles..might as well hang out with those worthless people that use yeti tonics and make more noise..so annoying like another title.

MithranArkanere · Jan 15, 2009, 04:04 PM // 16:04

A title for a single profession...?

I see...

No.

It's bad enough to have a title that can be obtained only by characters of a campaign or a title that can be tried only once.

No need for more bad titles. Only the questing title is left. Only that one.

Nathaniel (Was 'ere) · Jan 15, 2009, 04:15 PM // 16:15

Quote:

Originally Posted by MithranArkanere

A title for a single profession...?

I see...

No.

It's bad enough to have a title that can be obtained only by characters of a campaign or a title that can be tried only once.

No need for more bad titles. Only the questing title is left. Only that one.

Well, maybe we need one title per proffession. A kill-count for Sins etc?

MithranArkanere · Jan 15, 2009, 04:41 PM // 16:41

Yeah, and resurrections for monks?
No.
Titles should be for doing something you do while playing, not for doing something you can repeat again and again, forgetting about the rest of the game.

The Wisdom and Treasure hunter where changed so people could go for them while playing, without having to stick to one character.

So no.